TVC 't Hoekske TVC 't Hoekske
info@tvchethoekske.tk
 
 FAQFAQ   ZoekenZoeken   GebruikerslijstGebruikerslijst   GebruikersgroepenGebruikersgroepen   RegistrerenRegistreren 
 ProfielProfiel   Log in om je privéberichten te bekijkenLog in om je privéberichten te bekijken   InloggenInloggen 

asics cumulus

 
Nieuw onderwerp plaatsen   Reageren    TVC 't Hoekske -> Adressen en Kalender
Vorige onderwerp :: Volgende onderwerp  
Auteur Bericht
Penny Gosse
Newbie


Geregistreerd op: 28 Apr 2020
Berichten: 3

BerichtGeplaatst: 28-04-2020 08:11:07    Onderwerp: asics cumulus Reageren met citaat

And yes, runner's will asics shoes always get injured, and we will do so because we are often dumb and run more than we should and when we should not. However, in the absence of clinical trials, which ASICS has not published in a peer reviewed journal to show that their own shoes reduce injuries, we rely mostly on anecdote. Anecdotes suggest that some runners benefit from a barefoot or minimalist approach. Why ignore this? If you believe that humans are variable, why is the 12mm model so ubiquitous in the ASICS shoe lineup. Where's the evidence?

He asks for ONE piece of evidence, so here's one. Again to Squadrone and Gallozzi, 2009. Running in zero drop Vibram Fivefingers asics kayano compared to traditional shoes reduces oxygen consumption and reduces ground contact time (which has been shown to be associated with greater speed). Maybe it's not a perfect example, but the claim that there is NO evidence is false. asics gel kayano

We can turn this around and ask for peer reviewed, published evidence of a benefit to running in ASICS shoes. What is the benefit of a 12mm lifted heel? You'll typically hear about reduced Achilles problems, but has this been proven? Richards et al., 2008 state that "… the overall impact on injury rates of running in a shoe with an elevated heel remains untested in clinical trials ."

I think I've said enough here. My position is asics gt 2000 and has been that each runner is an individual, and I agree with Bartold when he states that. Given this, different runners have different preferences and needs. Some may want a 12mm lifted shoe, but others don't. Some of those who don't might have made the switch to escape a long term injury, and it's clear that in many cases switching to minimalist shoes has helped.

That's the difference between the height of the forefoot and the height of the rear foot, so if you've got a cushion type shoe it might be 24mm and 14mm off the ground. A racing flat might be slimmer at 10mm and 20mm. We've done a lot of research on this and we understand that it actually puts your foot in a mechanically better position, asics tiger makes it more stable, takes a load off the Achilles tendon… so there's a lot of positives.

of course not.. they have choice, and for some people, this product will.. for whatever reason not suit them, so they should and must look elsewhere.. but the key here is to allow choice. The problem I have with this argument is the sense that the advice is that everyone will benefit from wearing a minimalist shoe, or at the very least, a shoe with zero raise gradient. Sorry, I do not agree [img]http://www.jeanwyllys.com/images/detail/asics tiger-364wsq.jpg[/img] , and that is taking the choice away frm the athlete.
Terug naar boven
Profiel bekijken Stuur privébericht
Berichten van afgelopen:   
Nieuw onderwerp plaatsen   Reageren    TVC 't Hoekske -> Adressen en Kalender Tijden zijn in GMT + 1 uur
Pagina 1 van 1

 
Ga naar:  
Je mag geen nieuwe onderwerpen plaatsen in dit subforum
Je mag geen reacties plaatsen in dit subforum
Je mag je berichten niet bewerken in dit subforum
Je mag je berichten niet verwijderen in dit subforum
Je mag niet stemmen in polls in dit subforum


Wilt u geen reclame op dit forum en genieten van extra voordelen? Klik dan vlug hier voor meer informatie!
 

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
immo op Realo
Maak snel, eenvoudig en gratis uw eigen forum: Gratis Forum



Charcoal Theme by Zarron Media, converted for phpBB 2.0.5 by phpBB2.de